Notes
- Agenda and scoping
- the main problem is that receiving funds can be ambiguous and complicated in a multichain world.
- The aim of this discussion is to figuring out the options for unambiguously sending, we will especially focus on links as a tool for resolving these complexities
- Sending funds can also be done via links
- To fix the multichain ambiguouty, we have the EIP-3770 option which is to pre-pin the name of the chain, e.g. eth:0x…
- This should be a discussion about the options around creating a standard
- Round of questions
- Why are testnet addresses and non-testnet addresses different?
- Why is no one using EIP-3770?
- no non-obvious answer (little cross ecosystem movement)
- Discussion
- Users lose funds because they get the chains wrong
- Keystore contracts have many disadvantages
- URLS
- URLs can be carry the information
- Payments and Request links exists
- web3 URI
- using the web3:// URI would be one option, could be any URI (https://ethereum-magicians.org/t/standardize-url-format-for-web3-browsers/2422)
- how do we be credibly neutral with domains?
- These URLs should resolve automatically
- Users should have to be able to state preferred tokens and chains
Links